Important: The POPLINE website will retire on September 1, 2019. Click here to read about the transition.

Your search found 2 Results

  1. 1
    302643

    WHO updates medical eligibility criteria for IUCDs.

    Kenya. Ministry of Health; Family Health International [FHI]

    Nairobi, Kenya, Ministry of Health, 2004 Jun. [2] p. (IUCD Method Briefs Update)

    The World Health Organization (WHO) recently revised the guidelines for IUCD use as part of an update of its Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (MEC). These revisions will improve quality of care and reduce medical barriers for women who are considering an IUCD as a contraceptive method. Based on the latest clinical and epidemiological research, the revisions are particularly significant for women at risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, and women living with HIV or AIDS. Research has shown that while some conditions restrict IUCD initiation, they do not necessarily affect the safety of continued use. Under the new guidelines, for example, a client who has gonorrhea or chlamydial infection is considered a Category 4 for IUCD initiation and should be advised to choose another method. However, if an IUCD user develops an STI, she can be treated with antibiotics without the IUCD being removed (Category 2). In addition, the client should be counseled about partner notification and treatment, and condom use. (excerpt)
    Add to my documents.
  2. 2
    272300

    A randomized comparative study of interval insertion of three intrauterine devices: the copper T 220c, the Nova T and the WHO levonorgestrel 2 ug IUD.

    Gao J; Wu SC; Song GY; Miao L; Cheng JH; Sun HZ

    [Unpublished] 1985 May. 5 p. (Project: 82901)

    The objective is to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of 3 IUDs inserted in 300 health women, aged 24-38. All have had at least 1 full-term delivery. Subjects were randomly allocated to 1 of the 3 IUDS: the Copper T 220C (Tcu 220c), the Nova T, and the World Health Organization levonorgestrel 2 ug IUD. Insertion was done from the 3rd to the 5th day of menstruation between Feb. and Sept. 1984 and followed up at 48 hours, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after IUD insertion. 12 month data was collected for cumulative rates, based on life table procedures and analyzed with log-rank test. There was no loss to follow up and no insertion failure. All levonorgestrel IUDs have been removed because the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD has a relatively high risk of ectopic pregnancy. The use-related discontinuation rates of Tcu 220c, Nova T, and levonorgestrel IUD during 12 months of use, were 11.1, 2.4, and 12.7, respectively. The difference between Tcu 220c and Nova T were statistically significant (p.<0.01). The continuation rates of Tcu 220c, Nova T, and levonorgestrel during 6 months of use were 94.0, 99.0, and 96.0, respectively. During 12 months of use, they were 88.9, 97.6, and 87.3 respectively. 1 ectopic pregnancy occurred with the levonorgestrel IUD after 7 months of use. No pregnancy occurred in Nova T users. The pregnancy rates of Tcu 220c and levonorgestrel IUD during 12 months of use were 1.0 and 1.3, respectively. Removal rates for bleeding with Tcu 220c and levonorgestrel IUD during 12 months of use were 3.1 and 1.0, respectively. The removal rate for pain with Tcu 220c during 12 months of use was 2.0. The duration of bleeding and spotting with 3 IUDs, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of use are illustrated. Preliminary results show that the Nova T is superior to Tcu 220c and levonorgestrel IUDs. Expulsion is the main event in both Nova T and Tcu 220c. More attention should be paid to the insertion technique. The duration of bleeding and spotting of levonorgestrel IUD were longer in the last 3 months after insertion, but was shortest at 1 year of use when compared with Tcu 220c and Nova T.
    Add to my documents.