Your search found 2 Results
Training and reference guide for a screening checklist to initiate use of the copper IUD. Second edition.
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International [FHI], 2009. 79 p. (USAID Cooperative Agreement No. GPO-A-00-05-00022-00)This training and reference guide was developed for family planning service providers interested in using the Checklist for Screening Clients Who Want to Initiate Use of the Copper IUD, commonly referred to as the "IUD Checklist." Designed to serve as both a training and reference tool, the guide is composed of two parts: a training module and a collection of essential, up-to-date reference materials on the copper intrauterine device (IUD). This guide is part of a series to train on other checklists. The IUD Checklist was developed to assist service providers in screening clients who have already been counseled about contraceptive options and who have made an informed decision to use the copper IUD. This simple job aid is based on the technical guidance provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) in its Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (2004, updated 2008). The checklist supports the application of these guidelines -- known as the WHO MEC -- into service delivery practice. (Excerpts)
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS. 1994 May; (3):104.In reply to a summary of an article by Bhupesh Mangla (Lancet, May 29, 1993), a representative of Finishing Enterprises, Inc, the original licensee of the Population Council for manufacture of the Copper T IUD, maintains that the components supplied to Hindustan Latex Ltd (HLL), the Indian company selected in a program of the Indian government and the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) to manufacture the finished IUDs, were neither defective nor substandard. The National Centre of Technical Evaluation of the Indian Institute of Technology, which had no previous experience in this area, established its own specifications prior to transfer of the technology. Finishing Enterprises was uninformed of the changes and delivered components made according to US Food and Drug Administration and international standards. Since they did not meet the Indian specifications, it was recommended that they be held. This does not mean they were unsafe. Differences in the standards were discussed in March 1992 by experts during a Population Council meeting organized by the Indian government and UNFPA. The components were certified to meet international standards and were found to be safe and suitable. The statement that the Ministry was pressured to accept the consignment without further action is, therefore, inaccurate. The Indian Ministry of Health and HLL have since resolved the issue, and manufacture of the IUDs is proceeding with the components supplied by Finishing Enterprises. This resolution was complicated by political motivation, personal bias, and pressure brought by competing Indian firms. In order to prevent this in the future, manufacturers who are experienced with international standards should be involved in evolving national standards, and care should be taken that these are communicated to the appropriate parties.