Your search found 2 Results
In: Family planning. Meeting challenges: promoting choices. The proceedings of the IPPF Family Planning Congress, New Delhi, October 1992, edited by Pramilla Senanayake and Ronald L. Kleinman. Carnforth, England, Parthenon Publishing Group, 1993. 163-71.The costs of family planning programs was discussed by the International Planned Parenthood Federation in 1991-92 highlighting demand and resources. They proposed a strategy to review methodologies used by the World Bank, USAID, and UNFPA; and to develop cost analysis methodologies. Expenditures in 25 family planning associations (FPAs) worldwide were also reviewed in this presentation. The results showed that worldwide the average IPPF commodity grant represented only 5.7% of all grants and income. Most FPAs had personnel costs that were 30-50% of total expenditure, although Korea and Malaysia had personnel costs of about 60%. Lebanon, Indonesia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Mexico had lower personnel costs because they relied heavily on volunteer labor. The variation in average cost per couple year of protection (CYP) could be explained by the differences in programs in terms of clinic and nonclinic service delivery; information, education, and communication (IEC), and other development projects. Therefore, FPA expenditures by type consisted of these categories. The IEC category included males, youth, and women-in-development projects. Tanzania reported very low cost per CYP (less than $5), but a very high cost per visit (more than $14) because a large proportion of its commodities were distributed through non-FPA channels. In contrast, Madagascar had a lower clinic service delivery cost ($1.29), compared with a cost per CYP of $18 because it distributed all the contraceptives through clinics. The cost per CYP was high in Liberia (about $32), followed by Kenya (about $20), Madagascar (about $19), Ethiopia (about $16), and Tanzania (about $4). Most of these CYP costs were derived from grants. In the future FPA might investigate some other issues: the measurement of demand and need, the projecting of future costs, and the role of FPAs in filling the gap between public expenditures and community needs.
[Unpublished] 1993. Presented at the Expert Meeting on Information Systems and Measurement for Assessing Program Effects, Washington, D.C., September 9-10, 1993. Sponsored by National Academy of Sciences Committee on Population.  p.Profamilia has been affiliated with the International Planned Parenthood Federation since 1967, and it objectives are to promote family planning (FP) in Colombia with information and services. 70% of couples using modern methods obtained them from Profamilia. 69% of Colombian women of reproductive age are current users of FP. There are 47 Profamilia clinics, 8 of which offer FP only to men. Surgical contraception was offered to men starting since then. The 1990 Demographic and Health Survey indicated that female sterilization led the way in FP methods, followed by oral contraceptives and the IUD. About 80% of new acceptors choose sterilization and the IUD, and they have become progressively younger. In 1970 Profamilia started community-based distribution of OCs and condoms and inaugurated social marketing in 1974. OCs and condoms donated by foreign agencies are sold in pharmacies at low prices. The Evaluation and Research Department comprises the Service Statistics, Evaluation, and Research Sections. Monthly reports are produced on FP services provided, based on total number of new acceptors per clinic and per method, total number of follow-ups, sociodemographic characteristics of new acceptors, number of male and female sterilizations, number of couple years of protection per program and per clinic, educational activities, finances, and supplies used. Service statistics are used for client care, program operation, administrative monitoring, measurement of program activity, supervision, evaluation, and research. Volume indicators measure services rendered and the number of clients served; coverage indicators measure the extent of services provided to various groups; quality indicators include measures of comprehensiveness, timeliness, continuity, and satisfaction; effectiveness indicators measure the achievement of objectives; and efficiency indicators relate to inputs such as cost and facilities.