![]() |
|
Peer Reviewed 1. 343535 [Click link to view full record] ACOG Committee Opinion No. 450: Increasing Use of Contraceptive Implants and Intrauterine Devices to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009 Dec; 114 (6) :1434-1438.
| |
2. 331499 [Click link to view full record]
Aradhya K; Lebetkin E. Hormonal methods of contraception for youth. More effective strategies are needed to improve access and encourage consistent use. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Family Health International [FHI], Interagency Youth Working Group, 2009 May. [4] p. (YouthLens on Reproductive Health and HIV / AIDS No. 30) |
|
Peer Reviewed 3. 343079 [Click link to view full record] Arribas-Mir L; Rueda-Lozano D; Agrela-Cardona M; Cedeno-Benavides T; Olvera-Porcel C; Bueno-Cavanillas A. Insertion and 3-year follow-up experience of 372 etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implants by family physicians in Granada, Spain. Contraception. 2009 Nov; 80 (5) :457-62.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 4. 330560 [Click link to view full record] Bachmann G; Korner P. Bleeding patterns associated with non-oral hormonal contraceptives: a review of the literature. Contraception. 2009 Apr; 79 (4) :247-58.
| |
|
5. 343607 [Click link to view full record]
Bryant A; Kovar CL; Luchowski AT. Pills are not enough: the case for long-acting reversible contraceptives--and how North Carolinians can benefit. North Carolina Medical Journal. 2009 Sep-Oct; 70 (5) :459-62.
| |
6. 331085 [Click link to view full record]
Chakhtoura Z; Canonico M; Gompel A; Thalabard JC; Scarabin PY; Plu-Bureau G. Progestogen-only contraceptives and the risk of stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation. 2009 Apr; 40 (4) :1059-62.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 7. 342772 [Click link to view full record] Curtis KM; Ravi A; Gaffield ML. Progestogen-only contraceptive use in obese women. Contraception. 2009 Oct; 80 (4) :346-54.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 8. 341716 [Click link to view full record] Dore DD; Norman H; Seeger JD. Eligibility criteria in venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke among transdermal contraceptive system users. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009 Jul; 114 (1) :175.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 9. 330488 [Click link to view full record] Foster DG; Rostovtseva DP; Brindis CD; Biggs MA; Hulett D; Darney PD. Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program. American Journal of Public Health. 2009 Mar; 99 (3) :446-51.
| |
10. 329576 [Click link to view full record]
Gastaminza Lasarte G; Algorta Pineda J. [Descriptive study on contraceptive requirements for clinical trials in Spain. Do we need a debate?] Estudio descriptivo de las recomendaciones anticonceptivas en los ensayos Medicina Clinica. 2009 Jan 24; 132 (2) :70-4.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 11. 343397 [Click link to view full record] Grimes DA. Forgettable contraception. Contraception. 2009 Dec; 80 (6) :497-9.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 12. 341802 [Click link to view full record] Haimovich S. Profile of long-acting reversible contraception users in Europe. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. 2009 Jun; 14 (3) :187-95.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 13. 343396 [Click link to view full record] Harvey C; Seib C; Lucke J. Continuation rates and reasons for removal among Implanon users accessing two family planning clinics in Queensland, Australia. Contraception. 2009 Dec; 80 (6) :527-32.
| |
|
14. 343376 [Click link to view full record]
Hohmann H. Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2009; 3 :205-11.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 15. 342394 [Click link to view full record] Hubacher D; Lopez L; Steiner MJ; Dorflinger L. Menstrual pattern changes from levonorgestrel subdermal implants and DMPA: systematic review and evidence-based comparisons. Contraception. 2009 Aug; 80 (2) :113-8.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 16. 343406 [Click link to view full record] Lindsay P. Localised lipoatrophy at the site of Implanon insertion. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2009 Oct; 35 (4) :266; author reply 266.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 17. 330950 [Click link to view full record] Lipetz C; Phillips C; Fleming C. Actual cost of providing long-acting reversible contraception: a study of Implanon((R)) cost. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2009 Apr; 35 (2) :75-9.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 18. 330557 [Click link to view full record] Lipetz C; Phillips CJ; Fleming CF. The cost-effectiveness of a long-acting reversible contraceptive (Implanon) relative to oral contraception in a community setting. Contraception. 2009 Apr; 79 (4) :304-9.
| |
19. 330973 [Click link to view full record]
Lopez LM; Grimes DA; Schulz KF; Curtis KM. Steroidal contraceptives: effect on bone fractures in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; (2) :CD006033.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 20. 343395 [Click link to view full record] Lucke JC; Watson M; Herbert D. Changing patterns of contraceptive use in Australian women. Contraception. 2009 Dec; 80 (6) :533-9.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 21. 343407 [Click link to view full record] Mansour D. Implant location technique. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2009 Oct; 35 (4) :265.
| |
22. 341649 [Click link to view full record]
Mansour D. UK centres for Implanon removal [letter] Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2009 Apr; 35 (2) :130.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 23. 329638 [Click link to view full record] Mansour D. UK provision for removal of non-palpable contraceptive implants. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2009 Jan; 35 (1) :3-4.
| |
|
24. 343610 [Click link to view full record]
McNeill G; Ward E; Halpenny D; Snow A; Torreggiani W. Ultrasound appearances of Implanon implanted contraceptive devices. JBR - BTR. 2009 Sep-Oct; 92 (5) :259-60.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 25. 330053 [Click link to view full record] Nasr A; Nafeh HM. Effect of etonogestrel contraceptive implant (Implanon) on portal blood flow and liver functions. Contraception. 2009 Mar; 79 (3) :236-9.
| |
|
Peer Reviewed 26. 343408 [Click link to view full record] Reader CA. Pregnancy at time of change of Implanon implant. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2009 Oct; 35 (4) :265; author reply 265.
| |
|
27. 330741 [Click link to view full record]
Riney S; O'Shea B; Forde A. Etonogestrel implant as a contraceptive choice; patient acceptability and adverse effect profile in a general practice setting. Irish Medical Journal. 2009 Jan; 102 (1) :24-5.
| |
|
28. 343616 [Click link to view full record]
Rivet CC. Migraine and risk of stroke ... or progestin-only pills [letter] BMJ. 2009; 339 :b4842.
| |
|
29. 331282 [Click link to view full record]
Rosales Aujang E; Gonzalez Roque MG. [Usuariass sociodemographic characteristics of the contraceptive implant releasing etonogestrel] Caracteristicas sociodemograficas de las usuarias del implante anticonceptivo Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico. 2009 Mar; 77 (3) :136-41.
| |
|
30. 342927 [Click link to view full record]
Ruddick C. Long-acting reversible contraception: reducing unintended pregnancies. Community Practitioner. 2009 Sep; 82 (9) :24-7.
| |