About POPLINE Services Tools Contact Us Search POPLINE View Cart
Your search found 1 record(s).
New Basic Search    |     New Advanced Search    |     POPLINE Document Delivery Policy

1.
Title: Family-size control.
Author: Bongaarts J; Potter RG
Source: In: Bongaarts J, Potter RG. Fertility, biology, and behavior: an analysis of the proximate determinants. New York, New York, Academic Press, 1983. :151-179. (Studies in population)
Abstract: Family size control has 2 main aspects: attaining the number of children desired and holding family size to that level. Subfertility constitutes a failure to achieve the first objective. When youthful marriage combines with modest family size aspirations to assure that the mother potentially completes her childbearing before age 30, the proportion subfertile remains well below 10%. Under these conditions, whether or not the couple deliberately space their desired births, and thereby prolong intervals between consecutive children by 1 or 2 years, has little influence on the fraction subfertile. Only when marriage age approaches 30, and 2 or 3 children are wanted rather than 1, do spacing goals appreciably differentiate the incidence of subfertility. The incidence of subfertility associated with seeking a specified number of boys (or a predesignated number of girls) is nontrivially higher than the subfertility associated with the goal of having twice that number of children but without regard to sex composition. This inequality arises from the large chance variations in the number of sons and daughters required to reach a given number of children of the same sex. The combination of youthful marriage and modest family size goal, which reduces the risk of subfertility thanks to a relatively early completion of desired childbearing, at the same time increases the length of the "risk period" from attainment of desired family size to onset of fertility, and consequently contributes to excess fertility. In a series of REPMOD runs simulating modern conditions, risk period length is explored in relation to marriage age, number of children wanted, spacing goals, and effectiveness of contraception employed for spacing purposes. Respecting excess fertility, 3 standards of family limitation were investigated by means of REPMOD in an American context. These stanards involve averages of .20, .38, and .50 excess births per couple whose first marriage remained intact until past menopause. The most demanding standard of .20 corresponds to what was claimed by married respondents in the middle 1970s. The medium standard of .38 constituted the counterpart for the early 1970s. The more lax standard of .50 excess births/couple represents an upward adjustment of the latter in order to encompass the estimated incidence of induced abortion and associated unreported accidental pregnancies. 3 further issues were addressed, 2 of them applicable to the American setting. First, assuming that induced abortion is eschewed, highly efficient contraception can be counted on to lower the fraction of family limiters who suffer an unwanted birth, but unfortunately that same highly efficient contraception also raises the likelihood of an inconveniently long interval to any first unwanted birth that does occur. Secondly, when a marriage is precipitated by a premarital conception allowed to go to term, the risk period is augmented, with a correspondingly higher expectation of excess fertility. The Bangladesh context is invoked in order to demonstrate a final point. Prolonged, as opposed to brief postpartum anovulation, significantly reduces fertility when contraception is absent or least efficient.
Language: English

Keywords:
FAMILY SIZE, IDEAL | FERTILITY DETERMINANTS | COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND PROGRAMMING | UNITED STATES | BANGLADESH | RESEARCH REPORT | MARRIAGE | INFERTILITY | MOTHERS | BIRTH SPACING | BIRTH INTERVALS | SEX FACTORS | PROBABILITY | AGE FACTORS | MENOPAUSE | ABORTION | PUERPERIUM | ANOVULATION | CHILDBIRTH | SEX PREFERENCE | CONTRACEPTION FAILURE | CORRELATION STUDIES | USE-EFFECTIVENESS | Family Size | Family Characteristics | Family and Household | Fertility | Population Dynamics | Demographic Factors | Population | Information Processing | Information | North America | Americas | Developed Countries | Asia, Southern | Asia | Developing Countries | Nuptiality | Reproduction | Parents | Family Relationships | Family Planning | Fertility Measurements | Population Characteristics | Statistical Studies | Studies | Research Methodology | Fertility Control, Postconception | Ovarian Effects | Ovary | Genitalia, Female | Genitalia | Urogenital System | Physiology | Biology | Pregnancy Outcomes | Pregnancy | Value Orientation | Psychological Factors | Behavior | Contraceptive Usage | Contraception | Contraceptive Effectiveness
Document Number: 266701   Notification
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs Information & Knowledge for Optimal Health (INFO) Project
111 Market Place Suite 310, Baltimore, MD 21202
Phone: 410-659-6300    Fax: 410-659-6266    
Security & Privacy Policy
Icon Depicting USAID Seal