POPLINE Document Number: 313775
Author(s):
Thomsen SC
Gallo MF
Ombidi W
Omungo Z
Janowitz B
Source citation:
Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2007 Aug 1;83(5):419-420.
Abstract:
The objectives were to determine whether the process of informing research participants that they would be tested for the presence of a biological marker of semen exposure would reduce bias in their reports of unprotected sex. A randomised trial of 210 female sex workers from Mombasa, Kenya, was conducted, where half the group had advance knowledge (via the request for informed consent) that they would be tested for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in their vaginal fluid before they reported on sex and condom use for the past 48 h. The other half were invited to participate (via additional informed consent) in the test for PSA after they had already consented to be questioned and reported on these sexual behaviours. A trained nurse instructed participants to self-swab to collect vaginal fluid specimens, which were tested for PSA using ELISA. Reporting of unprotected sex did not differ between those with advance knowledge of the test for PSA and those without this knowledge (14.3% v 11.4%, respectively; p = 0.27). Surprisingly, more women with advance knowledge (15.8%) had discrepant self reports and PSA results than women without advance knowledge (9.1%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.8 to 4.5). Knowing that one's answers to a questionnaire could be verified with a biological marker of semen exposure did not make respondents more likely to report unprotected sex. (author's)
Keywords:
GlobalIndex page
Research Report
Clinical Trials
Questionnaires
Sex Workers
Testing
Semen
Sex Behavior
Bias
Clinical Research
Research Methodology
Behavior
Measurement
Seminal Vesicles
Genitalia, Male
Genitalia
Urogenital System
Physiology
Biology
Error Sources